Fox Information Host Confronts GOP Gov. Greg Abbott on Texas Abortion Legislation, Vow to ‘Remove Rape’
Fox Information anchor Chris Wallace confronted Texas Governor Greg Abbott, a Republican, over his state’s new anti-abortion legislation—asking pointed questions over whether or not the GOP lawmaker helps the ban in instances of rape and incest because the legislation is presently written.
The U.S. Supreme Court docket in the beginning of September allowed the extremely controversial Texas anti-abortion legislation to take impact in a 5-to-4 resolution. The laws successfully bans all abortions after a fetal heartbeat is detected—typically round six weeks. Critics have repeatedly defined that almost all ladies are usually not even conscious they’re pregnant at that time within the being pregnant.
Wallace raised the difficulty with Abbott throughout a Sunday interview on Fox Information Sunday, stating that the legislation doesn’t even provide any exceptions in instances of rape or incest. The GOP governor has beforehand defended the legislation and argued that Texas will “eradicate” rape going ahead.
“In 2019, which is the final yr that we now have numbers for, nearly 15,000 instances of rape had been reported in your state of Texas,” Wallace mentioned. “And nearly everybody says that is a extreme undercount. There are much more instances that simply aren’t reported.”
“Is it cheap to say to anyone who’s the sufferer of rape and may not perceive that they’re pregnant till six weeks, ‘Properly, don’t fret about it as a result of we’ll eradicate rape as an issue within the state of Texas?'” the Fox Information host requested the Republican lawmaker.
Abbott responded by saying that survivors of sexual assault “deserve assist.” He mentioned that his state is “stepping up to ensure we offer that by signing a legislation and creating within the governor’s workplace a sexual assault survivors activity pressure.”
Wallace then interjected, once more reiterating that “there have been greater than 15,000 rapes in 2019 while you had been governor.” He requested Abbott if he can be keen to signal laws to amend the present ban to carve out exceptions for rape and incest. Texas state Consultant Lyle Larson, a Republican, has put ahead a invoice that might make such exceptions, but it surely’s not anticipated to go within the conservative legislature.
“Will you signal it or not?” the Fox Information host requested Abbott.
We have to return to the explanation the legislation was handed within the first place,” the Texas governor responded. “The purpose is to guard the lives of each youngster with a heartbeat.”
Wallace once more reduce in, asking: “Together with the kid of a rape?”
Abbot replied by insisting that the legislation was constitutional. Nevertheless, the Fox Information host then doubled down on his query, asking once more: “However are you saying that you’ll not signal an exception for rape and incest?”
The GOP governor punted, saying that it would not go within the state’s legislature.
“You are making a hypothetical that is not going to occur as a result of that invoice is just not going to succeed in my desk,” Abbott mentioned.
The Texas anti-abortion legislation used an uncommon authorized technique in its bid to be upheld by the Supreme Court docket. As an alternative of calling for state authorities officers to enforced the ban, it permits anybody in to file lawsuits in opposition to ladies who search abortions in addition to those that help them in that course of. The legislation imposes fines of $10,000—which might be collected by the person who sues.
Critics—conservative and liberal—have raised issues concerning the authorized precedent being set by the laws. Many have argued that it primarily setup a vigilante justice system. Even some distinguished Republicans have mentioned they imagine the controversial legislation, which reproductive rights activists argue is unconstitutional, will ultimately be struck down within the courts.
“I believe the Supreme Court docket will swat it away as soon as it involves them in an applicable method. Whether it is as horrible as individuals say it’s, will probably be destroyed by the Supreme Court docket,” GOP Senator Invoice Cassidy, a Louisiana Republican, advised ABC Information’ This Week earlier this month after the Supreme Court docket allowed the legislation to enter impact.
The nation’s prime court docket mentioned in its ruling that its resolution shouldn’t be seen as resolving core points associated to abortion.
“In reaching this conclusion, we stress that we don’t purport to resolve definitively any jurisdictional or substantive declare within the candidates’ lawsuit,” the court docket mentioned within the resolution. “Particularly, this order is just not based mostly on any conclusion concerning the constitutionality of Texas’s legislation, and under no circumstances limits different procedurally correct challenges to the Texas legislation, together with in Texas state courts.”
The Justice Division has sued Texas over the anti-abortion legal guidelines, saying it is “clearly unconstitutional.” Different authorized instances involving the legislation are pending as properly.
Newsweek reached out to Abbott’s press secretary for additional remark, however didn’t instantly obtain a response.